Articles About Internews
World Bank should link loans to press freedom
By David Hoffman
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 2006
ARCATA, California At 1 a.m. on a recent morning in
Nairobi, masked police officers broke into the offices of KTN television
and The Standard, a Kenyan newspaper, both owned by the Standard Media
Group. Commandos with assault rifles seized files and equipment. The
printing press was shut down, newspapers were burned, employees terrorized
and three reporters were jailed.
While the Kenyan president and several ministers pleaded ignorance
of the assault, John Michuki, the internal security minister, admitted
that the press raids were planned by government officials, who presumably
wanted to send a signal to the Kenyan media that recent reporting on
government corruption would not be tolerated. "When you rattle a snake
you must be ready to be bitten," he said.
Such a blatant crackdown on the media had not been seen in Kenya
for 20 years. While 26 embassies and international organizations protested,
including the United Nations, the World Bank, as is its custom, kept
silent.
Then, after hesitating for six days, the bank openly rebuked the
government for the raid, and The Standard reported that the bank had
imposed a new rule making press freedom a condition before the World
Bank would agree to release $250 million in frozen loans. The loans had
been withheld since reports surfaced of massive government fraud, even
before John Githongo, appointed by President Mwai Kibaki to be Kenya's "anticorruption
czar," exposed details of government graft and fled the country.
Colin Bruce, the World Bank's country director in Kenya, denied
that the bank was making freedom of the media a new element of conditionality,
but by then the Kenyan stock market had already tumbled.
Even if formal conditionality has not been imposed, the World Bank's
president, Paul Wolfowitz, is quietly breaking precedent by ordering
the bank to publicly protest when press freedoms are under attack.
Wolfowitz understands that open news media are the most important
means to expose the endemic corruption that is undermining economic growth
in the developing world. And he is determined to do more than just talk
about it. He recently held up $800 million in loans, including the quarter
of a billion dollars for Kenya, because of allegations of corruption. "Corruption
is the biggest threat to democracy since Communism," Wolfowitz has said.
Wolfowitz and senior World Bank economists know that strong, independent
news media play a key role in promoting transparency and good governance,
which in turn lead to economic and political development. Corruption
can only flourish when governments operate with impunity outside the
bright lights and public exposure that independent media bring. So autocrats
and corrupt politicians everywhere seek to suppress their homegrown independent
media.
The bank has been reluctant in the past to speak out on this issue
for fear that it would be seen as interfering in the domestic politics
of sovereign states. But media freedom is a universal right; it is also
a precondition for tackling the central issue of corruption. As Wolfowitz
has said, "you really can't talk about economic development without talking
about freedom of the press."
If Wolfowitz and the Bank are to attack corruption effectively,
they would also be well advised to make media freedom a precondition
for future loans. The adoption of a media accountability index with common
standards, to measure a country's compliance with basic media freedoms,
would greatly reduce corruption in the developing world.
Inducements to increase transparency within government can only
go so far. Unleashing a free press makes the public an active participant
in reform. Protected by the threat of World Bank sanctions, the media
everywhere would play their natural role of watchdog of the public interest.
In his book, "America at the Crossroads," Francis Fukuyama concludes
that domestic pressure is the most effective force for long-term institutional
reform. A free press guarantees that the public is informed and has a
voice. By making press freedom a condition for its loans, the World Bank
would protect the media, allowing them to defend the public's right to
transparency and accountable government.
The bank is moving in the right direction. Media conditionality
would be a decisive step forward.
(David Hoffman is President of Internews Network, an international
non-profit organization that promotes access to information for people
around the world.)
|